VW’s 2nd attempt at a bakkie

[grips]

Derick now you have spoiled a very smart picture of the Amarok with that fugly contraption you posted with it

[Quack]

Jammer, ffffffferskriklik jammer!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Mike Nel]

Damn! If only it had an engine cover






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That Amarok is photoshopped into the picture. No one drives with a window open through mud at speed

[Quack]

Klein foutjie Upholstery cleaner is a wonderful thing



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Mike Nel]

[XJ Junkie]

Damn! If only it had an engine cover






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Therein lies the irony. That Renault has one.

[ThysleRoux]

In Afrikaans we have a saying "Al dra 'n aap 'n goue ring (engine cover?), hy bly maar steeds 'n lelike ding!!!"

The Renault remains FUGLY and no engine cover can change the fact! So ugly, in fact, that it is a serious contender for the title in the thread about the ugliest vehicle elsewhere on the forum !!

[XJ Junkie]

Thys. I always know when I’m in the lead in a debate.......It’s when one of the antagonists elects to attack whatever brand I drive, instead of the context of what I said.

The obvious way too retaliate is with a photo of an ugly VW, but there’s just too much subject matter to choose from.

......but don’t tell anybody

[ThysleRoux]

Neil, there are FUGLY vehicles from every manufacturer you can think of - granted.

If an engine needs a cover to make it presentable, it is just bad design of the ancillary layout that needs to be hidden. Very much like a garden service bakkie that cannot drive off-road without a diff lock or a platkar that falls off the road because it does not have all the acronyms ............

[Quack]

Damn! If only it had an engine cover






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Therein lies the irony. That Renault has one.

Sarcasm is the lowest form of witt! I’m obviously still aiming too high!

Neil, brace yourself, there is a video going around, I suspect it will be viral soon of a melktrok that hands an RS its backside on a dragstrip, I’m too unfazed to look for a link right now! I know, the melktrok is not in the same class and it’s purpose is somewhat ill defined

And as far as attacking the brand, one question, who started, with direct references to both brands? (OP refers)

But as a good friend of mine once remarked, “never take a battle of witt to an unarmed person”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Johannes]

Julle praat te veel engels ! Eks verlore

[XJ Junkie]

Sarcasm is the lowest form of witt! I’m obviously still aiming too high!

Yebbut it’s still a recognized form of wit, which is spelled with one ‘t’.

Did you see what I did there?

Neil, brace yourself, there is a video going around, I suspect it will be viral soon of a melktrok that hands an RS its backside on a dragstrip, I’m too unfazed to look for a link right now! I know, the melktrok is not in the same class and it’s purpose is somewhat ill defined‍

The RS can’t be much good because a 90’s Defender can do out drag an Amarok.

And as far as attacking the brand, one question, who started, with direct references to both brands? (OP refers)

Yebbut it’s my brand bashing thread. Go start your own!

If you do, I’d be happy to address the context.

But as a good friend of mine once remarked, “never take a battle of witt to an unarmed person”

You get him to join (for backup)

[Quack]

Junky you’ll make an excellent boxer, because you won’t recognise a tko, even if it was planted on your snoz!

On the other hand, a good coach knows when to drop the towel


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Quack]

Saw this beaut today!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Mike Nel]

Saw this beaut today!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Get your eyes tested... ASAP