Mikem Supsension

Ford to build Ineos/Defender

Offroad Vehicle Specific Discussions
User avatar
XJ Junkie
Location: Cape Town
Been thanked: 1 time
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:47 pm
Contact:

Ford to build Ineos/Defender

#1

Post by XJ Junkie »

Chemical Firm Wants Ford Factory To Build Its Defender-esque SUV

Ford's engine factory in Bridgend, Wales, is on Ineos' shortlist for its new automotive venture.

Chemical giant Ineos has moved a step closer to its first automotive production foray by entering talks with Ford to build an off-road vehicle at the manufacturer's engine factory in Wales.

Ineos has been planning to enter the automotive industry for quite some time with an alternative to the Land Rover Defender (pictured) with similar styling to the iconic vehicle.

Ford's factory in Bridgend, south Wales currently produces engines for Jaguar Land Rover, despite both brands being sold to Tata in 2008. However, after Jaguar Land Rover has confirmed that it will stop sourcing engines from the factory as soon as 2020, which could leave as many as 1,100 of Bridgend's 1,700-strong workforce without jobs. Ford is currently Britain's biggest engine producer, making half of the country's 2.7 million units at both the Bridgend plant and its other production facility in Dagenham, near London.

It's not just the factory's Jaguar Land Rover operations that are under threat either. Ford is one of several major carmakers worried about the effects Brexit could have on production, imports and supply chains, type approval, and costs.

That is where Ineos comes in. The London-based firm has earmarked the Wales site as a potential production location for its off-road vehicle venture. The Financial Times broke the news, citing sources said to be close to the discussions.

Ineos confirmed to the Financial Times that it had "several great options" regarding production locations, but it didn't confirm or deny the link to Bridgend. Ineos also said it will make its decision by the end of the year.

Despite being known for its chemical production, Ineos is definitely serious about building its first car. The company headed by Sir Jim Ratcliffe has already contracted former Mercedes-Benz offshoot MB tech to engineer the upcoming SUV, and Magna International – which also has Tesla, Volkswagen, BMW and Toyota as clients and also produces the Mini Countryman on behalf of BMW in Europe – to develop the new car's chassis.

While the Ineos SUV will resemble the old Defender, Land Rover itself is also wtorking on a successor, which is slated to arrive next year.

The hotly-anticipated new Defender will add a more luxury and technology compared to the outgoing model in order to bring it well and truly into the 21st century, and by bringing the car more in line with the rest of its range, Land Rover is hoping that annual sales figures will increase to around 100,000 a year with the new generation – five times more than the old car.

https://www.motor1.com/news/275867/ineo ... d-factory/
Disclaimer: Uninformed, no research, just very strong opinions

Mike Nel
Location: Cape Town
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 81 times
Posts: 1460
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 7:22 am

#2

Post by Mike Nel »

Yes please. Make the Defender to be more in line with the current line up. What a load of bollocks
2017 Land Cruiser 200
2022 Corolla Cross (Yes. It's a Hybrid)
BushLapa Ratel nr 731

User avatar
Hedgehog
Location: Rustenburg
Has thanked: 66 times
Been thanked: 72 times
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 6:20 am

#3

Post by Hedgehog »

I think those pics are stolen from this site..: https://www.landrover.com/explore-land- ... derv8.html

Edit..
Last edited by Hedgehog on Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
SSII enabled tool
Sempiternis et fortes

User avatar
Wooky
Location: JHB
Been thanked: 7 times
Posts: 335
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 9:46 am

#4

Post by Wooky »

The article says that the picture is of a Defender. So no miss-quoted / stolen pics.

" ....alternative to the Land Rover Defender (pictured) with similar styling to the iconic vehicle."

Will be interesting to see if they can get the Defender type shape to meet international safety specs.
If I understood correctly, that was ultimately its downfall.

User avatar
Hedgehog
Location: Rustenburg
Has thanked: 66 times
Been thanked: 72 times
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 6:20 am

#5

Post by Hedgehog »

Wooky wrote:
Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:24 am
The article says that the picture is of a Defender. So no miss-quoted / stolen pics.

" ....alternative to the Land Rover Defender (pictured) with similar styling to the iconic vehicle."

OK, valid point
SSII enabled tool
Sempiternis et fortes

User avatar
ThysleRoux
Location: Cape Town
Been thanked: 1 time
Posts: 949
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 7:32 pm

#6

Post by ThysleRoux »

Wooky wrote:
Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:24 am
The article says that the picture is of a Defender. So no miss-quoted / stolen pics.

" ....alternative to the Land Rover Defender (pictured) with similar styling to the iconic vehicle."

Will be interesting to see if they can get the Defender type shape to meet international safety specs.
If I understood correctly, that was ultimately its downfall.
Not necessarily the shape, but more the chassis design - it was basically still running on a chassis designed in the 1940's, meaning there were no crumple zones or shock absorbing bumpers, etc. The boxy shape is evident in many vehicles that meet the current safety standards.

I am sure that Landrover could have kept up with the requirements if they really wanted too, without losing the general "feel" or capabilities of the Defender.
I refuse to be POLITICALLY CORRECT to impress others - Deal with it
FLEX is UNDERRATED :twisted:

User avatar
XJ Junkie
Location: Cape Town
Been thanked: 1 time
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:47 pm
Contact:

#7

Post by XJ Junkie »

Hedgehog wrote:
XJ Junkie wrote:
Mon Nov 12, 2018 9:06 pm


And that fact puts your bulitin up as fake news.... Sorry Neil
There are no pictures yet.

Definitely not fake news. I’ve been watching this space for a long time. Jim Ratcliff is the wealthiest man in the UK so he’s got the resources

Google Projekt Grenadier


Disclaimer: Uninformed, no research, just very strong opinions

User avatar
Wooky
Location: JHB
Been thanked: 7 times
Posts: 335
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 9:46 am

#8

Post by Wooky »

Wasn't there also an issue with the roof structure being to weak in a roll over situation?

User avatar
Wooky
Location: JHB
Been thanked: 7 times
Posts: 335
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 9:46 am

#9

Post by Wooky »

Hedgehog wrote:
Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:43 am
OK, valid point
No worries....I also thought the title pic was of the NEW Ineos vehicle until I read further down

User avatar
Hedgehog
Location: Rustenburg
Has thanked: 66 times
Been thanked: 72 times
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 6:20 am

#10

Post by Hedgehog »

XJ Junkie wrote:
Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:47 am
Hedgehog wrote:
XJ Junkie wrote:
Mon Nov 12, 2018 9:06 pm


And that fact puts your bulitin up as fake news.... Sorry Neil
There are no pictures yet.

Definitely not fake news. I’ve been watching this space for a long time. Jim Ratcliff is the wealthiest man in the UK so he’s got the resources

Google Projekt Grenadier
I really hope this gets going but, taking into consideration that it will be a small production, it will most probably be marketed to the very wealthy. And this is just my thoughts, but we all know how those guys can spoil a product by either making it stupidly fast, or stupidly plush. And both of those stupid things will make it stupidly expensive.
SSII enabled tool
Sempiternis et fortes

User avatar
XJ Junkie
Location: Cape Town
Been thanked: 1 time
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:47 pm
Contact:

#11

Post by XJ Junkie »

Jim Ratcliff is very much a Defender Guy so he knows what’s required by the traditional enthusiasts.

There’s already an infrastructure in place so now they just need to decide where exactly to build it.

The target price will be in line with the outgoing Defender.

As Thys pointed out, the Defender never evolved. They got away with avoiding safety tests for a long time in Europe because they never changed the bulkhead, which was a loophole.

But they couldn’t sell it in the USA which is why it dwindled to 25k units per year, globally. By comparison, they sell that many Wranglers per month, just in North America.
Disclaimer: Uninformed, no research, just very strong opinions

User avatar
Wooky
Location: JHB
Been thanked: 7 times
Posts: 335
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 9:46 am

#12

Post by Wooky »


User avatar
XJ Junkie
Location: Cape Town
Been thanked: 1 time
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:47 pm
Contact:

#13

Post by XJ Junkie »

Yes that’s their website
Disclaimer: Uninformed, no research, just very strong opinions

User avatar
Mad Manny
Location: Johannesburg
Has thanked: 785 times
Been thanked: 1315 times
Posts: 7191
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:31 am

#14

Post by Mad Manny »

The NEW Jimny largely replaces the old Defender90...

Jimny has a Wheelbase of 2250 vs the 90 @ 2362
Jimny's length is 3625 the 90 was 4077 long.
Jimny is 1645 wide vs the 90's 1791.

So no need to make a 90...

"No one ever got stuck - in mid air!"

2010 Fortuner D-4D 4x4 'Fearless'
2006 Conqueror Conquest 'Gearless'

User avatar
XJ Junkie
Location: Cape Town
Been thanked: 1 time
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:47 pm
Contact:

#15

Post by XJ Junkie »

Manny what are you smoking?
Disclaimer: Uninformed, no research, just very strong opinions

Post Reply