Mikem Supsension

Crank snappers & oil change intervals

General / Off Topic chat
Post Reply
User avatar
XJ Junkie
Location: Cape Town
Been thanked: 1 time
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:47 pm
Contact:

Crank snappers & oil change intervals

#1

Post by XJ Junkie »

Yesterday I was chatting to the workshop owner who looks after Swambo’s Fiat. They specialize mainly in Italian cars, new & old, from Fiats, Alfa’s, Lancia’s, Maserati’s & Ferrari’s, so he has extensive experience in what makes an engine last long. He actually just finished reassembling a 3.0 V12 Ferrari for a 1966 Ferrari 330.

His best advice for making an engine last very long is that oil changes with high quality oil are critical. A number of cars on sale have stipulated oil change intervals that can be best described as optimistic by their manufacturers. It isn’t just the engines pistons that are dependent, but also things like turbos are also dependent on healthy correctly spec oil.

I had a Cooper Works that had supposed intervals of 25kkm but my mechanic reckoned that what came out didn’t look like oil. It looked like grease. My wife’s Fiat has 30kkm intervals but we change oil & filter every 15kkm. But he reckons 10kkm is preferable.

Which brings me to the 2.7 TDi crank snapper in the Disco. I saw one next to the road earlier with the bonnet up & suspect that the inevitable had happened.

It’s well known that both the Peugeot 407 & Jaguar S-Type use a version of that 2.7 engine yet they appear to last a lot longer in the Pug & the Jag.

So I looked up the oil service intervals:

Peugeot is every 10000 km
Jaguar is every 16000 km
Land Rover is every.........25000 km [emoji102]

It’s not a very good starting point for longevity, especially with its inherent flaw. Yet people will still buy them......
Disclaimer: Uninformed, no research, just very strong opinions

User avatar
KurtG
Location: London
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 13 times
Posts: 2405
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2018 12:52 pm

#2

Post by KurtG »

Did the Peugeot 407 really come out with a 180Kw V6 Diesel engine?
Flex is overrated

User avatar
KurtG
Location: London
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 13 times
Posts: 2405
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2018 12:52 pm

#3

Post by KurtG »

Wikipedia confirms that indeed it came out with the 2.7 Diesel (150kw) and 3.0 Diesel (177kw). Those must have been pretty potent!
Flex is overrated

User avatar
Mad Manny
Location: Johannesburg
Has thanked: 788 times
Been thanked: 1321 times
Posts: 7217
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:31 am

#4

Post by Mad Manny »

When I bought my KB280DT is was 7500km oil service & 15 000km full service.
I stuck to it.
Then they said that it had changed to services every 15 000km only.
So I continued secretly changing oil at the 7500km interval until the warranty was over.

If I buy a vehicle with a service plan of every 15 000km I secretly replace oil & filter at 7500km

Once my vehicles are out of warranty I service @ every 10 000km - it's easier for me & my drivers to remember.


"No one ever got stuck - in mid air!"

2010 Fortuner D-4D 4x4 'Fearless'
2006 Conqueror Conquest 'Gearless'

User avatar
Mad Manny
Location: Johannesburg
Has thanked: 788 times
Been thanked: 1321 times
Posts: 7217
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:31 am

#5

Post by Mad Manny »

KurtG wrote:
Tue Aug 06, 2019 8:41 pm
Wikipedia confirms that indeed it came out with the 2.7 Diesel (150kw) and 3.0 Diesel (177kw).
One of the reasons why PeeJoe never became a crank snapper, despite having the same motor, was explained to me by Neil XJJ & Apoc.
The PeeJoe is significantly lighter than a D3 or D4 because of the two Chassis system Land Rover decided to use on the Disco...
"No one ever got stuck - in mid air!"

2010 Fortuner D-4D 4x4 'Fearless'
2006 Conqueror Conquest 'Gearless'

User avatar
XJ Junkie
Location: Cape Town
Been thanked: 1 time
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:47 pm
Contact:

#6

Post by XJ Junkie »

Their outputs was about the same as the original D3, circa 150 kw & 440 Nm.

But the weight of the Pug & Jag were no more than 1700 to 1800 kg, whereas the D3 was around 2.5 tons. The Disco has a unibody mounted onto a ladder frame chassis. That was always going to be heavy.

Image
Image

The 2.7 only was available in the 407 coupe but it’s a pretty sexy looking car.
Disclaimer: Uninformed, no research, just very strong opinions

User avatar
grips
Location: kathu
Has thanked: 111 times
Been thanked: 242 times
Posts: 1285
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2018 5:08 am

#7

Post by grips »

VW had a 15k km service interval on its 2.0l VW TDI bus. I took an oil sample after a service and send it to Wearcheck. Dust and other contamination were out of spec so I reduced intervals to 10k km.

Think the very high intervals recommended are based on conditions in Europe were they have better quality fuel and not the harsh conditions of Africa.
You will never find me without Stroh or a 4x4 :D

User avatar
Wave
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 8 times
Posts: 625
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 4:23 am

#8

Post by Wave »

Also, Europe want to reduce impact on the environment (old filters and dirty oil) so they extend the service intervals
Geoff Craig
'24 Mitsu Triton
'08 Toyota Blade Master G
'10 Conqueror Comfort

User avatar
XJ Junkie
Location: Cape Town
Been thanked: 1 time
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:47 pm
Contact:

#9

Post by XJ Junkie »

Or save on the cost of services under motorplan?
Disclaimer: Uninformed, no research, just very strong opinions

User avatar
KurtG
Location: London
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 13 times
Posts: 2405
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2018 12:52 pm

#10

Post by KurtG »

XJ Junkie wrote:Or save on the cost of services under motorplan?
Winner winner chicken dinner [emoji1787]
Flex is overrated

Reenen
Location: Berg
Been thanked: 8 times
Posts: 661
Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 6:15 pm

#11

Post by Reenen »

[emoji3541]
Last edited by Reenen on Wed Aug 07, 2019 8:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Apocalypse
Location: Cape Town
Posts: 809
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:40 pm

#12

Post by Apocalypse »

Mad Manny wrote:
Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:23 pm
KurtG wrote:
Tue Aug 06, 2019 8:41 pm
Wikipedia confirms that indeed it came out with the 2.7 Diesel (150kw) and 3.0 Diesel (177kw).
One of the reasons why PeeJoe never became a crank snapper, despite having the same motor, was explained to me by Neil XJJ & Apoc.
The PeeJoe is significantly lighter than a D3 or D4 because of the two Chassis system Land Rover decided to use on the Disco...
Well. Close. Not so much accelerating the weight as that only happens periodically , but overcoming drag to maintain a speed. The D3/4 is a brick and the drive train, wheels , weight all contribute to the drag.

If it’s using 3 times as much fuel at a given speed , load on the crank is 3 times as much, that’s a no brainer.

And sure, more regular oil changes certainly reduce wear.

But the reality is that an awful lot of Motors take a lot more strain and snapping a crank is unusual to say the least.

The bottom line is that the crank is as weak as a politician’s morals when faced with a fistful of cash.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes

Post Reply