Erin Bosch, Insurance

Interesting Tow Test comparing new Ranger 2.0 to Old 3.2

User avatar
Hedgehog
Location: Rustenburg
Has thanked: 66 times
Been thanked: 71 times
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 6:20 am

Interesting Tow Test comparing new Ranger 2.0 to Old 3.2

#1

Post by Hedgehog »

SSII enabled tool
Sempiternis et fortes

Mike Nel
Location: Cape Town
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 81 times
Posts: 1460
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 7:22 am

#2

Post by Mike Nel »

That was to be expected somewhat

And the 2.0liter is the same one as the Amarok??
2017 Land Cruiser 200
2022 Corolla Cross (Yes. It's a Hybrid)
BushLapa Ratel nr 731

User avatar
Hedgehog
Location: Rustenburg
Has thanked: 66 times
Been thanked: 71 times
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 6:20 am

#3

Post by Hedgehog »

As far as I know, they are two different engines. The volksie does not have the same engine as the frod

81.0 by 95.5 millimetres bore and stroke for the Dub
and 84.01 x 90.03 for the blue badged one
Last edited by Hedgehog on Mon Sep 02, 2019 10:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
SSII enabled tool
Sempiternis et fortes

User avatar
XJ Junkie
Location: Cape Town
Been thanked: 1 time
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:47 pm
Contact:

#4

Post by XJ Junkie »

It makes sense that a 3.2 tows better than a 2.0. But it appears that the days of anything over 3.0 diesel are numbered.
Disclaimer: Uninformed, no research, just very strong opinions

User avatar
Hedgehog
Location: Rustenburg
Has thanked: 66 times
Been thanked: 71 times
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 6:20 am

#5

Post by Hedgehog »

XJ Junkie wrote:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 10:48 am
It makes sense that a 3.2 tows better than a 2.0. But it appears that the days of anything over 3.0 diesel are numbered.
Why would it make sense Neil? The figures point to a different outcome to be had..

I think its more the fact that the gearbox had less ratios to think about, and this gave the engine time to build boost? My theory no 1
The other is that the smaller engine cannot generate the same plane of torque (more peaky) and this might then cause gearbox confusion.

Dunno, I would love to try them both back to back with my Commander in tow
SSII enabled tool
Sempiternis et fortes

User avatar
XJ Junkie
Location: Cape Town
Been thanked: 1 time
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:47 pm
Contact:

#6

Post by XJ Junkie »

I only read the article quickly. I thought it said that the 3.2 tows better? Less fuel?
Disclaimer: Uninformed, no research, just very strong opinions

User avatar
Hedgehog
Location: Rustenburg
Has thanked: 66 times
Been thanked: 71 times
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 6:20 am

#7

Post by Hedgehog »

XJ Junkie wrote:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 12:31 pm
I only read the article quickly. I thought it said that the 3.2 tows better? Less fuel?
It did say the 3.2 was better
SSII enabled tool
Sempiternis et fortes

User avatar
XJ Junkie
Location: Cape Town
Been thanked: 1 time
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:47 pm
Contact:

#8

Post by XJ Junkie »

Even with my smaller diesel motor I see a massive increase in consumption under load, whereas larger cc diesels are less susceptible to higher consumption because they don’t have to work as hard.
Disclaimer: Uninformed, no research, just very strong opinions

Disco Nic
Location: Swakopmund, Namibia
Has thanked: 94 times
Been thanked: 125 times
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:39 pm

#9

Post by Disco Nic »

Jokes on them, Ranger owners only get towed (to the workshop)
2019 Renault Duster - Prestige
2023 GWM P-Series LS - Wuhan Warrior
2009 Echo 4 Off-Roader - Glamper

User avatar
Hedgehog
Location: Rustenburg
Has thanked: 66 times
Been thanked: 71 times
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 6:20 am

#10

Post by Hedgehog »

Disco Nic wrote:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 1:30 pm
Jokes on them, Ranger owners only get towed (to the workshop)
You must be full of hives now.. Going on the first line of your signature.
SSII enabled tool
Sempiternis et fortes

Disco Nic
Location: Swakopmund, Namibia
Has thanked: 94 times
Been thanked: 125 times
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:39 pm

#11

Post by Disco Nic »

Hedgehog wrote:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 1:50 pm
Disco Nic wrote:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 1:30 pm
Jokes on them, Ranger owners only get towed (to the workshop)
You must be full of hives now... Going on the first line of your signature.
No Andrewvandustbinhog, I'm perfectly fine.

I don't own a Ranger.
2019 Renault Duster - Prestige
2023 GWM P-Series LS - Wuhan Warrior
2009 Echo 4 Off-Roader - Glamper

Mike Nel
Location: Cape Town
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 81 times
Posts: 1460
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 7:22 am

#12

Post by Mike Nel »

I loved towing with my Ranger when I still had it. That 3.2 liter is a gem
2017 Land Cruiser 200
2022 Corolla Cross (Yes. It's a Hybrid)
BushLapa Ratel nr 731

User avatar
KurtG
Location: London
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 13 times
Posts: 2405
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2018 12:52 pm

#13

Post by KurtG »

A gem until it blows a turbo, Mike. I have heard of plenty going wrong under 50,000km.
Flex is overrated

henris
Location: Nigel, Gauteng
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 6 times
Posts: 242
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2019 10:54 am

#14

Post by henris »

KurtG wrote:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 7:06 pm
A gem until it blows a turbo, Mike. I have heard of plenty going wrong under 50,000km.
Dump the EGR
Dump the CAT
Open the exhaust
Add a proper fuel filter

And then you have a gem.
LC Troopie 1HDFTE
SADC Assist
08two49five9252

Disco Nic
Location: Swakopmund, Namibia
Has thanked: 94 times
Been thanked: 125 times
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:39 pm

#15

Post by Disco Nic »

henris wrote:
Mon Sep 02, 2019 7:34 pm
Dump the EGR
Dump the CAT
Open the exhaust
Add a proper fuel filter

And then you have a gem.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Ford will sodomize you if you do this. Nevermind getting the computers to not throw a hissy fit.
2019 Renault Duster - Prestige
2023 GWM P-Series LS - Wuhan Warrior
2009 Echo 4 Off-Roader - Glamper

Post Reply