Page 1 of 2
A question about CAT/CATS
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 8:13 am
by Mike Nel
Had the Cats removed yesterday (won't mention which vehicle)
I have noticed that the temperature gauge sitting a bit higher than normal. So the my question is, 'Is it normal for the car's temperature to be slightly higher after the removal of the CAT/CATS?
Re: A question about CAT/CATS
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 8:44 am
by XJ Junkie
This isn’t very good for the planet Mike.
Did they use a CAT fooler? It shouldn’t run hot
Re: A question about CAT/CATS
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 8:47 am
by Michael
Normally your car runs cooler because the hot gases are getting out faster. Running hotter probably means your ECU is confused by what it is seeing and your Air/Fuel ratio is out.
Re: A question about CAT/CATS
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 8:54 am
by Wave
Let us know how long until the engine light comes on, if the car is running hotter its not happy and something is amiss.
I would guess the vehicle not mentioned, as posted above, will most likely need a mini CAT/CAT fooler (approx R850ea)
Re: A question about CAT/CATS
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:33 am
by Mike Nel
Will check it out over the next few days
A question about CAT/CATS
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:38 am
by XJ Junkie
Take it to Maniac. They have a method of not needing a CAT fooler.
Mine doesn’t have one. They just reinstall the original oxygen sensor. Simple.
Re: A question about CAT/CATS
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:43 am
by Michael
XJ Junkie wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:38 am
Take it to Maniac. They have a method of not needing a CAT fooler.
Mine doesn’t have one. They just reinstall the original oxygen sensor. Simple.
That doesn't work because the ECU is expecting a different reading from the sensor before the cat and the sensor after the cat. With no cat, both sensors give the same reading and the ECU freaks out.
Re: A question about CAT/CATS
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:56 am
by XJ Junkie
Mine works. There must be some other black magic that they perform.
Re: A question about CAT/CATS
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 11:29 am
by Mike Nel
Michael wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:43 am
XJ Junkie wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:38 am
Take it to Maniac. They have a method of not needing a CAT fooler.
Mine doesn’t have one. They just reinstall the original oxygen sensor. Simple.
That doesn't work because the ECU is expecting a different reading from the sensor before the cat and the sensor after the cat. With no cat, both sensors give the same reading and the ECU freaks out.
They reprogrammed the ICU
Re: A question about CAT/CATS
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2019 6:28 am
by Ricof4e
Mike Nel wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 11:29 am
Michael wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:43 am
XJ Junkie wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:38 am
Take it to Maniac. They have a method of not needing a CAT fooler.
Mine doesn’t have one. They just reinstall the original oxygen sensor. Simple.
That doesn't work because the ECU is expecting a different reading from the sensor before the cat and the sensor after the cat. With no cat, both sensors give the same reading and the ECU freaks out.
They reprogrammed the ICU
Hopefully nobody died as a result

Re: A question about CAT/CATS
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2019 6:43 am
by grips
Engine should run cooler with CATS removed. Think the problem is with the reprogramming of the ECU.
Re: A question about CAT/CATS
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2019 7:54 am
by HenriSteyn
Ricoffy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 11, 2019 6:28 am
Mike Nel wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 11:29 am
Michael wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:43 am
That doesn't work because the ECU is expecting a different reading from the sensor before the cat and the sensor after the cat. With no cat, both sensors give the same reading and the ECU freaks out.
They reprogrammed the ICU
Hopefully nobody died as a result
Well spotted Ricoffy. Maybe the said vehicle needs to go into ICU to recover.
Re: A question about CAT/CATS
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2019 8:46 am
by Mike Nel
HenriSteyn wrote: ↑Thu Jul 11, 2019 7:54 am
Ricoffy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 11, 2019 6:28 am
Mike Nel wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 11:29 am
They reprogrammed the ICU
Hopefully nobody died as a result
Well spotted Ricoffy. Maybe the said vehicle needs to go into ICU to recover.
Especially if you guys know which vehicle it is

Anyways. The temperature stays the same, so not to worried about it
I do however see a remarkable saving in fuel. It went down from 11.4km/l to 12.3km per liter.
I will only properly judge this after a tank or two and not after a few 100 kilometers
Re: A question about CAT/CATS
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2019 9:25 am
by XJ Junkie
The FJ should use a bit less fuel & will sound better.
Re: A question about CAT/CATS
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2019 8:32 pm
by grips