Torque to Weight Ratio
- Chris Stoffel
- Location: Cape Town
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 9:54 pm
Torque to Weight Ratio
Grips have been thinking. It seems as if it is something he often does. When he has time of course.
So Grips thought that for 4x4ing the torque to weight ratio would be more important than the power to weight ratio.
I agree with Grips. When one is working at slow speeds torque counts most.
So, lets get some some Nm/weight ratios. OK?
So Grips thought that for 4x4ing the torque to weight ratio would be more important than the power to weight ratio.
I agree with Grips. When one is working at slow speeds torque counts most.
So, lets get some some Nm/weight ratios. OK?
Suzuki Jimny - Hobbit Car
- Jeanvn
- Location: Mossel Bay
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 1:21 pm
212NM/t
Jeep Wrangler TJ.
Not bad for a NA petrol.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jeep Wrangler TJ.
Not bad for a NA petrol.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
105 Land Cruiser
Amabroekies v6
Amabroekies v6
- ThysleRoux
- Location: Cape Town
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Posts: 949
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 7:32 pm
RooiTjiep @ 400nm/1840kg equates to 217 Nm/ton
I refuse to be POLITICALLY CORRECT to impress others - Deal with it
FLEX is UNDERRATED
FLEX is UNDERRATED
-
- Location: Berg
- Posts: 644
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 6:15 pm
-
- Location: Berg
- Posts: 644
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 6:15 pm
235nm/t
Safari stasiewa, petrol
245nm/t
Safari bakkie, diesel
297nm/t. Soon to be safari
Safari stasiewa, petrol
245nm/t
Safari bakkie, diesel
297nm/t. Soon to be safari
- XJ Junkie
- Location: Cape Town
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Posts: 1599
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:47 pm
- Contact:
If the purpose is to show offroad power, then when you’re in low range, you need to multiply the reduction. Otherwise the thread doesn’t make sense.
That’ll really show how much force you’ve got.
That’ll really show how much force you’ve got.
Disclaimer: Uninformed, no research, just very strong opinions
-
- Location: Berg
- Posts: 644
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 6:15 pm
Ek is aan stoei om vir my Mercedes w123 n crawl ratio van 348:1 te gee, met 500nm op engine...
- ThysleRoux
- Location: Cape Town
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Posts: 949
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 7:32 pm
I agree with you, but it's a starting point Neil. Apoc needs to revive the crawl thread that he started on the 4xwheelbarrowaxledesignforumXJ Junkie wrote:If the purpose is to show offroad power, then when you’re in low range, you need to multiply the reduction. Otherwise the thread doesn’t make sense.
That’ll really show how much force you’ve got.
Sent from my FIG-LX1 using Tapatalk
I refuse to be POLITICALLY CORRECT to impress others - Deal with it
FLEX is UNDERRATED
FLEX is UNDERRATED
- ThysleRoux
- Location: Cape Town
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Posts: 949
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 7:32 pm
Multiplying zero usable torque results in zero usable torque. The torque converter of an autobox can be a useful benefit or have a negative influence, dependung on terrain. In thr same way extra low low range ratios can be positive or negative, depending on the specific situation. In other words no technical spec is always the "useful" one in all circumstances, but all comparissons have to start at some point.
Sent from my FIG-LX1 using Tapatalk
Sent from my FIG-LX1 using Tapatalk
I refuse to be POLITICALLY CORRECT to impress others - Deal with it
FLEX is UNDERRATED
FLEX is UNDERRATED
- Chris Stoffel
- Location: Cape Town
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 9:54 pm
It would be nice if someone can show us how to work it out when the reduction of gears is considered. It will make this thread better and more complete.
Suzuki Jimny - Hobbit Car
-
- Location: Berg
- Posts: 644
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 6:15 pm
1ste rat ratio x low range ratio x diff ratio
Bv
4 x 2 x 4.11=32.88 ratio
Nou moet jy nog torque en revs en band grootte ook in bring
Bv
4 x 2 x 4.11=32.88 ratio
Nou moet jy nog torque en revs en band grootte ook in bring
- grips
- Location: kathu
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 134 times
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2018 5:08 am
Little Patrol 230kw and 500nm
384nm/t
Yank Ranger
272nm/t
Shows just how weight is a performance killer. With 70kw and 100nm more the Yank Ranger is defeated by the little v8 Patrol
I plan to build a 408 stroker for the Yank Ranger and strip off all items that add extra weight. Will then move the 347 stroker to Little Patrol.
This will give Little Patrol 461nm/t
384nm/t
Yank Ranger
272nm/t
Shows just how weight is a performance killer. With 70kw and 100nm more the Yank Ranger is defeated by the little v8 Patrol
I plan to build a 408 stroker for the Yank Ranger and strip off all items that add extra weight. Will then move the 347 stroker to Little Patrol.
This will give Little Patrol 461nm/t
You will never find me without Stroh or a 4x4
- XJ Junkie
- Location: Cape Town
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Posts: 1599
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2018 2:47 pm
- Contact:
What a lot of guys forget is that the moment you put in bigger tyres without out a diff ratio correction, the Nm will reduce in direct proportion to the percentage increase in tyre size.
Disclaimer: Uninformed, no research, just very strong opinions